<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Lifts iPhone Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appadvice.com/appnn/2008/10/apple-lifts-iphone-non-disclosure-agreement-nda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2008/10/apple-lifts-iphone-non-disclosure-agreement-nda/</link>
	<description>Latest News and Reviews on iPhone Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apple removes NDA from SDK Developers &#124; iPhone Sync</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2008/10/apple-lifts-iphone-non-disclosure-agreement-nda/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple removes NDA from SDK Developers &#124; iPhone Sync</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleiphoneapps.com/?p=1820#comment-3107</guid>
		<description>[...] via Apple iPhone Apps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Apple iPhone Apps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marten</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2008/10/apple-lifts-iphone-non-disclosure-agreement-nda/#comment-3088</link>
		<dc:creator>Marten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleiphoneapps.com/?p=1820#comment-3088</guid>
		<description>&quot;You’ll notice this newfound freedom only covers “released software,” meaning Apple will still maintain an iron grip on apps in development, and subsequently apps that never get “released” — sorta helpful when they control that release process, right?&quot;

I read this to mean Apple&#039;s toolkits and new firmwares, which members of the ADC receive ahead of time. For the Mac, these have always been under NDA, and will likely remain that way (which isn&#039;t unreasonable). I don&#039;t think &quot;software&quot; in Apple&#039;s statement means the software of developers, just the stuff Apple gives them (freely downloadable vs. beta versions only available to paid members).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You’ll notice this newfound freedom only covers “released software,” meaning Apple will still maintain an iron grip on apps in development, and subsequently apps that never get “released” — sorta helpful when they control that release process, right?&#8221;</p>
<p>I read this to mean Apple&#8217;s toolkits and new firmwares, which members of the ADC receive ahead of time. For the Mac, these have always been under NDA, and will likely remain that way (which isn&#8217;t unreasonable). I don&#8217;t think &#8220;software&#8221; in Apple&#8217;s statement means the software of developers, just the stuff Apple gives them (freely downloadable vs. beta versions only available to paid members).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trey vu</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2008/10/apple-lifts-iphone-non-disclosure-agreement-nda/#comment-3082</link>
		<dc:creator>trey vu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleiphoneapps.com/?p=1820#comment-3082</guid>
		<description>Does released software cover applications or Apple&#039;s firmware?  Interesting move on their part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does released software cover applications or Apple&#8217;s firmware?  Interesting move on their part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
