<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Thinks That The Approval Process Makes Developers Happy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appadvice.com/appnn/2009/11/apple-thinks-that-the-approval-process-makes-developers-happy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2009/11/apple-thinks-that-the-approval-process-makes-developers-happy/</link>
	<description>Latest News and Reviews on iPhone Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:10:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Dave</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2009/11/apple-thinks-that-the-approval-process-makes-developers-happy/#comment-32432</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appadvice.com/appnn/?p=37852#comment-32432</guid>
		<description>Most of the developers I know are absolutely thrilled to have their ancient buggy app pissing off cusomera while their new fixed version sits in limbo for weeks and then gets rejected due to a trivial bug that existed in the release, while the release has major issues.

If Apple is so sure developers and users like the approval process, they&#039;d end this while debate by allowing users to load apps directly from developers.  The app store would still exist and would still be a cash cow for those few who have done well, and since developers prefer the app store no one would use the alternate distribution method anyway. Either that it Apple is just trying to spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the developers I know are absolutely thrilled to have their ancient buggy app pissing off cusomera while their new fixed version sits in limbo for weeks and then gets rejected due to a trivial bug that existed in the release, while the release has major issues.</p>
<p>If Apple is so sure developers and users like the approval process, they&#8217;d end this while debate by allowing users to load apps directly from developers.  The app store would still exist and would still be a cash cow for those few who have done well, and since developers prefer the app store no one would use the alternate distribution method anyway. Either that it Apple is just trying to spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janey</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2009/11/apple-thinks-that-the-approval-process-makes-developers-happy/#comment-32409</link>
		<dc:creator>Janey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appadvice.com/appnn/?p=37852#comment-32409</guid>
		<description>I prefer some approval process. The Android Market is nothing but a big junkyard of buggy trash applications. There are a few good ones, but even apps by the bigger developers (for example the Facebook app) lack features that the iPhone counterpart has. For the most part, the Android Market has been overrun by cheap junk from people trying to make a few quick bucks. The actual market itself is a joke. I realize people don&#039;t like iTunes but at least you can find stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer some approval process. The Android Market is nothing but a big junkyard of buggy trash applications. There are a few good ones, but even apps by the bigger developers (for example the Facebook app) lack features that the iPhone counterpart has. For the most part, the Android Market has been overrun by cheap junk from people trying to make a few quick bucks. The actual market itself is a joke. I realize people don&#8217;t like iTunes but at least you can find stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphoneman</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2009/11/apple-thinks-that-the-approval-process-makes-developers-happy/#comment-32362</link>
		<dc:creator>iphoneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appadvice.com/appnn/?p=37852#comment-32362</guid>
		<description>i would rather the safety than having to jailbreak to get apps i want. especially since the jailbreak is more vulnerable to attacks than anything, since the software is being hacked in order to use 3rd party apps. you never know what your installing from cydia or anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would rather the safety than having to jailbreak to get apps i want. especially since the jailbreak is more vulnerable to attacks than anything, since the software is being hacked in order to use 3rd party apps. you never know what your installing from cydia or anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After Sitting In Apple&#8217;s Review Queue For Nearly Six Months, IUGO&#8217;s A.D.D. Is Finally Available &#171; : App Advice</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2009/11/apple-thinks-that-the-approval-process-makes-developers-happy/#comment-32351</link>
		<dc:creator>After Sitting In Apple&#8217;s Review Queue For Nearly Six Months, IUGO&#8217;s A.D.D. Is Finally Available &#171; : App Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appadvice.com/appnn/?p=37852#comment-32351</guid>
		<description>[...] Below is a quick rundown of what IUGO went through while trying to get A.D.D. approved.  As you can see, this safety net called the review process isn&#8217;t as developer friendly as Phil Schiller claims it to be. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Below is a quick rundown of what IUGO went through while trying to get A.D.D. approved.  As you can see, this safety net called the review process isn&#8217;t as developer friendly as Phil Schiller claims it to be. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Serrano</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2009/11/apple-thinks-that-the-approval-process-makes-developers-happy/#comment-32350</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Serrano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appadvice.com/appnn/?p=37852#comment-32350</guid>
		<description>As a former Verizon customer I can say that at least on long island verizon and AT&amp;T are on par performance wise. They both have decent coverage. Both charge too much, but AT&amp;T is a lot more honest about it and doesn&#039;t remove features without warning. I was a verizon customer for close to 10 years and I am a hell of a lot more satisfied with AT&amp;T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former Verizon customer I can say that at least on long island verizon and AT&amp;T are on par performance wise. They both have decent coverage. Both charge too much, but AT&amp;T is a lot more honest about it and doesn&#8217;t remove features without warning. I was a verizon customer for close to 10 years and I am a hell of a lot more satisfied with AT&amp;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
