May 13, 2011
An article published on April 2nd declared iPhone "dead in the water" as a result of Android's crushing momentum. Now, by most accounts, the author of that article, Henry Blodget, isn't exactly the most trustworthy of analysts-- in 2002, he was barred from the Securities industry, charged with civil liberties fraud and fined $2 million for publishing inaccurate and contradictory information. But nevertheless, the idea that "iOS is dead in the water, and Android killed it" has caught some people's attention. It certainly invites a compelling comparison to the Windows-vs-Mac OS battle. The problem is, not only is the iPhone not dead in the water: it's actually almost impossible to claim that it is. Horace Deidu at Asymco notes the origin of the phrase "dead in the water", which has to do with a ship losing its rudder control (and thus its steering and maneuverability). Perhaps Blodget's claim was meant to use the phrase rhetorically, as it's clear the iPhone isn't lacking in direction--or maneuverability-- by any stretch. Deidu then runs the numbers on this claim and concludes by stating,
On a unit basis and one the basis of vendor comparison, iPhone is doing very well. On the basis of value capture and profitability it’s doing even better.Think about this: Blodget claims that "Apple's iPhone share increased slightly, but is dead in the water and has now fallen way behind Android (in smartphones)." Sounds good as an attention-getter, but the iPhone's share of all phones is still growing, as its share of all smartphones. Apple is the 4th most popular phone maker in the world now, with a staggering 5% of all phones sold. That's more than RIM, HTC, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson. In noting these numbers, Deidu asks, "what makes the iPhone dead in the water?" He then discovers the exact pattern of factual exclusion that allows Android to claim victory: are you ready? If we count only:
- iPhone's share of
- mobile platforms'
- installed base
- without counting iPod touch or iPad
- in the US only